(Disclaimer: non music post)
It has become clear that what happens to women on a monthly
schedule and the products that women require at this time are not classed as
‘essential goods’, and recent campaigns show that for women in the UK this is not good enough and nor should it be.
The most recent campaign ‘Stop taxing periods. Period.’ is the inevitable cry
out of women who are being taxed for blood which they didn’t ask to spill in
the first place. This petition highlights that sanitary products are
non-essential due to their “luxury” good status, but whether one would call a
nappy-like strip taped to a pair of knickers, or cotton wool rolled up inside a
lady, luxury is dateable. Unbelievably products such as “helicopters”, “alcoholic jellies” and “exotic meats including
crocodile and kangaroo” are classed as “essential” and non-taxable. Having existed now for 18 years I can
safely say I survived without a ride in a helicopter or eaten crocodile and
kangaroo stew, but I could have not lived five of those years without the
“luxury” of sanitary products. Seemingly the government has combined two
conflicting sides: an unstoppable natural function and the economically
profitable.
In 2001 after campaigns arose the VAT on
lady-time products was reduced to 5%, but it still seems baffling that even
remains. It’s not as if such products exclusively
benefit menstruating females, in fact it benefits society as a whole; not only
do they ensure that a woman’s health and private life isn’t jeopardised it also
means there isn’t a need for someone to clean blood-soaked rags or where a
woman on her lady-time has sat on the bus. To justify such a tax on products
which are undeniably essential, despite not considered as such in technical
terms in the UK, and ultimately limiting their accessibility seems absolutely
effing barmy if you ask me.
Arguably, for a woman in the UK the idea
that life dependent items are classed as “luxury” makes trusting the current
government a hard thing to do (similar to David Cameron finding the abolition of said tax "hard to do"). Speaking of which lets look at some stats from
the UK taken in 2010 on the gender difference in Parliament: 78% of political
parties were made up of men (Labour, Conservative and Lib Dem) whilst only 22%
were women. Although there was an increase in female politicians, to 41% and not forgetting the three female politicians in up coming elections, women
remain the minority in the government both in the UK as well as internationally. Although
having said that in recent developments, in the UK, labour party deputy leader Harriet Harman is leading the "woman-to-woman"
initiative in order to encourage women to vote and
abolish the label that voting is a “men only” activity. Yet Harman’s “magenta”
mini bus has not gone unscathed from critics: some have labelled the attempt as
a ‘gimmick’ and ridiculed for being “patriarchally patronising”. As far as I can
agree that their ideal to discuss politics with women around a “kitchen table”
is patronising,
it’s the determination to encourage women to vote which I can strongly agree
with. Furthermore, scrutiny of the colour “magenta” arguably is society’s way
of overlooking what’s really important in this campaign: the female vote. Why
only last year was the same shade of pink used behind Ed Milliband’s head
during a campaign and no one said a dicky bird, on top of that people are quick
to accuse the party of sexism but neglect the issue of finding a colour which
doesn’t already represent a party or that carries an association elsewhere. Why
shouldn’t a party catch the attention of women to vote, it’s undeniably
necessary in this particular subject matter and it’s also a waste of our female
ancestor’s efforts to gain us women the vote, let’s not abuse it.
But it’s not only the physical health that
is increasingly worrying in regards to the subject, it’s the effect that the
taxation on sanitary goods and the pessimistic view which surrounds a woman’s
monthly schedule has on the psychology of our society that’s distressing. Let’s
get real here, it is unfortunately an unpleasant experience for any woman be it
the pain it causes to the fatigue it can bring, everyone is different and
suffer from different symptoms, or, lucky for some, not at all. But that
shouldn’t mean we don’t embrace the process, whether you are a participant or
non-participant. It’s difficult to track exactly when the negativity
surrounding menses truly began, but it clear that it has existed and reproduced
itself for generation after generation. Why only a few years ago did I hear a
boy younger than me describe a room of predominantly girls as “smelling of
period.” But if we don’t act to eliminate these views, that periods are “catastrophic”,
mostly, of those who aren’t even involved in the process then those who do have
to endure it will start to believe it too.
Menstruation is an essential part of our
society- always has been and undoubtedly always will be- a possible first step
in embracing this as fact is by removing the constraints to consume a vital range of
products that have been ongoing for decades. Let’s also take steps in
acknowledging our suffragette ancestors and ensure that women are having a say
in politics, don’t let your vote go to waste, if you haven’t done so already.
Whether you menstruate or you don’t, we should agree that it is vital to plug
up the taxation of sanitary goods, let the female votes flow and let’s put a
bloody stop to negative views surrounding menses. Period.
.jpg)
.jpg)
